FTD.de » Management + Karriere » Business English » Coke joins battle for the brand
  FTD-Serie: Serie Business English

Fehlt Ihnen im Englischen häufiger das treffende Wort? Kommen Sie trotz guter Vorsätze nicht dazu, ein Magazin oder Buch im Original zu lesen? Dann finden Sie hier interessante und vielfältige Lektüre aus der Financial Times - mit einem Glossar, das Ihnen auf die Sprünge hilft.

Merken   Drucken   05.12.2006, 13:00 Schriftgröße: AAA

Business English: Coke joins battle for the brand  

The drinks maker is adopting a proactive approach to social issues after a barrage of negative headlines and Coke boycotts on university campuses throughout North America and parts of Europe. von Andrew Ward
When Neville Isdell graduated from the University of Cape Town 40 years ago, he seemed an unlikely candidate to become chief executive of Coca-Cola. His degree was in social sciences and he qualified to become a social worker. But instead of joining the public sector, he took a job with Coke's local bottler in Zambia. "I remember going back to my university and one of my professors asked me what I was doing," Mr Isdell recalls. "He was horrified to hear I was in business. I said: 'You know, I actually believe I can create more value and help more people by working for the Coca-Cola Company than I would be able to do individually as a social worker.' To Coke's many critics, his rosy view of the company must seem absurd. For several years, it has faced a growing drumbeat of criticism over alleged mistreatment of workers in Colombia, use of water in drought-stricken parts of India and its role in the childhood obesity epidemic sweeping the developed world. With Coke boycotts on university campuses throughout North America and parts of Europe, the company appears to have succeeded Nike, Nestlé and McDonald's as chief corporate villain for the anti-globalisation movement. While student boycotts have made little impact on sales, the barrage of negative headlines threatens to tarnish Coke's most valuable asset: its brand. "Coca-Cola has always been seen as a force for good," says Tom Pirko, president of Bevmark, a beverage industry consultancy. "The danger is that the brand starts being seen as something bad." Until recently, Coke had a reputation for obstinacy in the face of criticism. But in the two years since Mr Isdell was appointed chief executive, Coke's approach has begun to change. Shortly after taking the helm, he gathered together his 150 top managers to set strategic priorities. The result was a list of five goals considered crucial to long-term growth. One was to make Coke the "recognised global leader in corporate social responsibility". For Coke, the target represented an important acknowledgement that the company must deal seriously with the range of social and environmental issues casting a cloud over its brand. Coke's most urgent task was to bring greater transparency to its global operations, which span more than 200 countries, so it could identify and tackle social and environmental risks before they became problems. Most of Coke's bottling and distribution operations are outsourced to independent companies. But, just as Nike was held accountable for labour abuses in overseas sweatshops, Coke has learned that it cannot escape responsibility for far-flung business partners. Coke's director of labour relations, Ed Potter, has launched an audit of labour practices throughout the Coke supply chain. All suppliers are required to adhere to Coke's own workplace rights policy. Coke has also sought a more constructive relationship with critics. The company opened dialogue with student groups and forged partnerships with non-governmental organisations. "One of the ways you get a company not to be seen as an inanimate object is to talk to folks," says Mr Potter. "You might not agree. But you develop a relationship." A similar strategy is being pursued by Jeff Seabright, head of environmental and water affairs at Coke. He has won the backing of Greenpeace for an initiative to make vending machines more environmentally friendly, provided funding for freshwater conservation projects and co-founded an alliance of companies and NGOs committed to widening access to safe drinking water and sanitation in the developing world. "Our brand has made us a target for critics to attract attention to their causes," says Mr Seabright. "But NGOs are starting to understand they can achieve more with us than against us because our brand and global presence makes us a powerful partner." While labour rights and water usage are the focus of Coke's fiercest critics, the issue causing arguably the greatest concern among ordinary consumers is childhood obesity. The company insists it is unfair to blame soft drinks for a problem with multiple causes. But here too it has softened its stance, embracing industry guidelines restricting the sale of sugary drinks in schools and supporting initiatives to encourage physical exercise among children. "Taking a leadership position on the school vending machine issue is something that Coke would not have done in the past," says Robert Davies, chief executive of the International Business Leaders Forum, which promotes sustainable business and counts Coke among its donors. "They have realised they have to respond to perceptions in the marketplace rather than to what they believe to be the facts." Ray Rogers, head of the Campaign Against Killer Coke, the company's fiercest foe, rejects the notion that Coke has changed. "They still deal with these issues as a public relations problem," he says. "Anything they have done to clean up their act is in response to political and economic pressure rather than because it is the right thing to do." Mr Isdell accuses the most vocal critics of spreading misinformation and manipulating people to advance their political cause. Coke's aim, he says, is to prevent those arguments gaining wider acceptance. "You are going to have a small percentage of people who you are never going to convince to drink Coca-Cola and who you are never going to convince about the good intentions of the Coca-Cola Company," he says. "The question is whether they can influence the others."
  • FTD.de, 05.12.2006
    © 2006 Financial Times Deutschland,
Bookmarken   Drucken   Senden   Leserbrief schreiben   Fehler melden  
Kommentare
Kommentar schreiben Pflichtfelder*




Texte zu den Business-English-Podcasts

Texte zu den Business-English-Podcasts

  •  
  • blättern
Suche in der FTD-Personendatenbank Who is who: Die Personendatenbank von FTD.de
 


  09.02. Kopf des Tages Shah Rukh Khan - Bollywood-Promi auf Eroberungstour
Kopf des Tages: Shah Rukh Khan - Bollywood-Promi auf Eroberungstour

Er hat mehr Fans als Brad Pitt und Johnny Depp zusammen. Doch wenn Indiens Star zur Berlinale kommt, geht es um Geschäft statt Glanz: Bollywood will die Welt erobern. mehr

 



  •  
  • blättern
MANAGEMENT

mehr Management

GRÜNDUNG

mehr Gründung

RECHT + STEUERN

mehr Recht + Steuern

KARRIERE

mehr Karriere

BUSINESS ENGLISH

mehr Business English

 
© 1999 - 2012 Financial Times Deutschland
Aktuelle Nachrichten über Wirtschaft, Politik, Finanzen und Börsen

Börsen- und Finanzmarktdaten:
Bereitstellung der Kurs- und Marktinformationen erfolgt durch die Interactive Data Managed Solutions AG. Es wird keine Haftung für die Richtigkeit der Angaben übernommen!

Über FTD.de | Impressum | Datenschutz | Disclaimer | Mediadaten | E-Mail an FTD | Sitemap | Hilfe | Archiv
Mit ICRA gekennzeichnet

VW | Siemens | Apple | Gold | MBA | Business English | IQ-Test | Gehaltsrechner | Festgeld-Vergleich | Erbschaftssteuer
G+J Glossar
Partner-Angebote