From his wooden house on
stilts, Kong Song, a Cambodian farmer, points out the tractor kicking up a huge dust cloud on the land where he and his fellow villagers once cultivated water-melons, maize and other lucrative cash crops to supplement their rice harvests. The watermelons, sold at a nearby beach resort, helped the villagers of Trapeang Kandol buy motorbikes and mobile phones and finance wedding feasts - significant economic advances in the impoverished countryside.
But last November Mr Kong Song and 52 families in his village were ordered off their land by Ko Kong Sugar Industry, a politically connected company that claimed it had official permission to absorb the fields into a new plantation. Since then, the
incensed farmers, with another 300
dispossessed families from the Sre Ambil district, have battled to reclaim land that has now been surrounded by a deep ditch, cleared with bulldozers and planted with sugar.
So far they have been met with brute force. Military police last year fired into a crowd of protesting villagers, injuring several. "We are so worried," says Mr Kong Song, who says he is left with just two hectares of paddy fields after the company seized five hectares from him. "I just think about how I can support my family because we depend on the land. We cannot survive with just two hectares."
The tensions in Sre Ambil are symptomatic of rural anger in an economically
resurgent Cambodia as powerful companies take possession of vast tracts of increasingly valuable land with little or no regard for the farmers already cultivating the fields. Licadho, a human rights group, says it received complaints about 115 rural land-grabbing cases in 2006 and that authorities and companies are increasingly responding to protests with violence.
In the 1970s, the radical
Khmer Rouge abolished private property, forcing people to live on collective farms. After their brutal reign, during which about one-quarter of the population
perished, Cambodia was left with just 6m people and there was little pressure on land. But with the population now up to 13m and the economy growing rapidly, land values are rising sharply, prompting those with
clout to snap up as much as they can.
Under Cambodia's progressive 2001 land law, farmers who have used land for five years peacefully and without dispute have the rights to it, but few poor farmers have undertaken the expensive process of obtaining full
title, or are even aware such a process exists. While the World Bank is now assisting with land titling, it is a slow
undertaking. Meanwhile, when villagers confront powerful
claimants to their lands, local authorities and courts frequently say they are powerless to intervene.
Hun Sen, prime minister, recognises that growing
rural discontent over land is a huge problem for his regime. "Landlessness and land-grabbing creates serious threat to the social and political stability of Cambodia," the long-time
strongman said in February, vowing to punish any officials involved. But so far, analysts say, his approach has been ad hoc, merely forcing a pair of high-profile officials to relinquish some land.
For all the tough rhetoric, much conflict
stems from state policies
ostensibly intended to transform
fallow or underutilised land into productive plantations for export-generating crops such as sugar. Since 1992, 57 companies, many with close connections to the ruling party, have been awarded "economic land concessions" covering nearly 1m hectares.
In theory, concessions should exclude farmers' lands or provide "fair, just compensation". But Henry Hwang, an adviser with the Cambodian Legal Education Centre, says these conditions are rarely met.
Ko Kong Sugar, partly owned by a businessman-senator, was last year granted a concession for 9,700 hectares of land in Sre Ambil, some of which was being
farmed by villagers. In Trapeang Kandol the company offered compensation of $50 per hectare, although rights lawyers, who are pursuing the case in the courts, say fair market value would have been $500-$1,000 per hectare. While 23 families accepted the money, another 27 families rejected it.
In nearby Chouk Village, Lay Doul, a mother of seven who lost eight hectares to the sugar plantation, is furious at forces that she says are leaving villagers worse off than they were under the Khmer Rouge. "During the Khmer Rouge time, they said 'everything belongs to everyone', and they provided food for us to eat," she said. "Now they take our land, without paying anything, and they are happy and we are crying."